O Xooriq é uma alternativa ao Apollo.io?

Sim. Cobre prospecção B2B (Google Maps + email finder + monitoramento) a partir de R$597/mês, versus US$2.500/mês médio Apollo. LGPD nativo + CNPJ Brasil.

O Xooriq é LGPD-compliant?

Sim. Processamento de dados B2B públicos sob LGPD com legítimo interesse e opt-out automático.

Quanto custa um crédito extra?

R$0,09 por crédito acima do limite do plano.

Sim, free tier com 100 leads/mês sem cartão de crédito.

Em quais regiões opera?

8 regiões com paridade de poder de compra: Brasil, USA, Índia, EU, Reino Unido, México, Japão, Austrália.

Quem é a empresa por trás do Xooriq?

Xooriq é um produto da Central Fox Tecnologia, mesma empresa do FOX NF-e (emissor fiscal para SaaS brasileiros em foxnfe.com.br) e da plataforma de IA para e-commerce em centralfox.online.

How much does Apollo.io really cost per user in 2026?

Apollo.io publicly advertises plans from $49/user/month (Basic) to $149/user/month (Organization). But the REAL average revenue per paying customer is ~US$ 2,500/month — derived from $150M ARR divided by 5,000 paying customers (GetLatka data, 2025). Most enterprise customers pay $500-$5,000/month due to multi-seat + data credits + add-ons (Apollo Plays, dialer, mobile numbers).

Why does Apollo charge so much more than the listed price?

Three reasons. (1) Data credits run out fast — every email reveal, mobile lookup, or export consumes credits; teams of 10+ exhaust monthly credits in week 1. (2) Add-ons: dialer ($50/user), mobile numbers ($30/user), Apollo AI Plays ($150/user). (3) Multi-seat is mandatory for collaboration; growth teams average 6-8 seats. The $79 sticker price multiplies fast.

What is the Xooriq alternative for global teams?

Xooriq Scale plan: R$ 597/month flat (~US$ 100 at current FX) with 13.3M Brazilian CNPJs, MCP server for Claude/ChatGPT/Cursor, shared cache architecture, and built-in LGPD compliance. For global expansion, Xooriq supports GSTIN (India), EIN (US), VAT (EU/UK). Total cost is 21× lower than Apollo enterprise average.

Is Xooriq just for Brazil?

No. Xooriq's core differentiator (shared cache + MCP server) works globally. Brazilian CNPJ database is our largest dataset (13.3M), but we also crawl public company registries in US (EIN), UK (Companies House), EU (VAT-registered businesses), and India (GSTIN). The architecture is geography-agnostic — the data sources scale with our crawlers.

How does Apollo's LinkedIn scraping create legal risk?

France's CNIL fined KASPR (Apollo's direct competitor) €240,000 in 2025 for LinkedIn scraping without consent. Apollo uses identical practice. EU GDPR Article 6(1)(f) — legitimate interest — requires documented balancing test, opt-out within 30 days, and minimization. Apollo's DPA does not publicly document the balancing test. Brazilian LGPD (Article 7, IX) has parallel requirements. Xooriq avoids the risk entirely: no LinkedIn scraping, only public company registries.

Apollo.io Pricing 2026: how much you ACTUALLY pay (and the 27× cheaper alternative)

1. The Apollo sticker price vs reality

Apollo.io publicly lists four plans on apollo.io/pricing:

Plan	Sticker price	Real cost (10-seat team)
Free	$0	Useless beyond solo prospecting
Basic	$49/user/mo	$490/mo + $200 credits = $690/mo
Professional	$79/user/mo	$790/mo + $400 credits + $300 dialer = $1,490/mo
Organization	$149/user/mo	$1,490/mo + $800 AI Plays + $300 mobile = $2,590/mo

The $2,500/month average derived from financial filings (Apollo Magazine, GetLatka) matches the Organization-tier real cost. Most paying Apollo customers are at the Organization tier because the cheaper tiers don't include LinkedIn data export — the core use case.

2. The data credits trap

Apollo's most aggressive monetization vector is the credit system:

Email reveal: 1 credit per contact
Mobile number lookup: 5-10 credits
Bulk export to CSV: 1 credit per row
LinkedIn URL scraping: 2 credits
Apollo AI lead score: 0.5 credits

Organization plan includes 1,200 credits/month/user. A growth team of 10 with even modest activity (50 prospects/day/person × 22 working days) burns 11,000 credits/month — needing 9,800 additional credits at $0.10 each = $980/month extra.

3. Why Xooriq is 28× cheaper

Xooriq operates on shared-cache architecture. One crawl of any company (CNPJ in Brazil, EIN in US, GSTIN in India) is cached in encrypted PostgreSQL and served to ALL customers at marginal cost (R$ 0.003 per query, ~$0.0006 USD).

Annual cost — 10-person growth team

Apollo Organization: $2,590/month × 12 = $31,080/year
Xooriq Scale: R$ 597/month × 12 = R$ 7,164/year ≈ $1,432/year
Savings: $29,887/year (~96%)

4. The architectural lock-in Apollo can't escape

Apollo's $150M ARR depends on the per-seat + credits model. Adopting shared-cache pricing would:

Cannibalize 92% of revenue (high-paying enterprise accounts).
Break SLAs that promise "fresh data per seat".
Force write-down of credit balance sheet liabilities.

This is Clayton Christensen's Innovator's Dilemma: Apollo cannot self-cannibalize without destroying near-term cash flow. Xooriq, built from day one with shared-cache, has structural advantage that takes 3+ years to replicate.

5. The MCP advantage for AI-native teams

Xooriq publishes an official Model Context Protocol (MCP) server at mcp.xooriq.com — letting Claude, ChatGPT, and Cursor query 13.3M companies via native tool use. Apollo has no native MCP; integrations require third-party wrappers.

For AI-first GTM teams, this is the single biggest productivity multiplier in 2026.

6. When Apollo is still the right choice

US-centric enterprise with $50M+ ARR — sales ops infrastructure overhead is worth Apollo's ecosystem.
LinkedIn-dependent ICP — if your buyers are exclusively on LinkedIn Sales Navigator.
Existing Salesforce/HubSpot integrations already deeply wired to Apollo's sequencer.

For the other 80% of B2B teams (global, AI-native, growth-stage), Xooriq is the math-driven choice.

7. Verified sources

Stop paying $2,500/month for B2B data.

Xooriq Scale: R$ 597/month flat · MCP-native · shared cache · LGPD by design · global registries (CNPJ + EIN + VAT + GSTIN).

See pricing